AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty - (MLS-C01) Exam Questions
Total Questions
Last Updated
1st Try Guaranteed
Experts Verified
Question 11 Single Choice
A data science team at your organization is tasked with creating a machine learning model to forecast the sale prices of houses using characteristics such as the home's square footage. However, approximately 10% of the entries in the modest-sized training dataset are missing the square footage attribute. Given the importance of model accuracy in your application, which approach should the team employ to handle missing values in the training data effectively?
Explanation
Click "Show Answer" to see the explanation here
Evaluate the effectiveness of various imputation methods for missing data in relation to model accuracy and missing data percentage.
Correct Choice: Employ k-nearest neighbors (KNN) imputation to fill missing square footage.
KNN imputation maintains the sample's structure and can accurately predict missing values based on similarity to nearest neighbors. It's well-suited for datasets with complex relationships.
Incorrect Choice: Impute missing square footage using mean imputation before training.
Mean imputation can reduce variance and introduce bias, especially if data is not missing at random. It's simple but may not be accurate for skewed distributions.
Incorrect Choice: Apply linear regression to estimate missing square footage based on other features.
While linear regression can predict missing values, it assumes a linear relationship between features, which may not always hold, potentially leading to inaccurate imputations.
Incorrect Choice: Replace missing square footage with the dataset's mode.
Mode imputation is simplistic and might be used for categorical data; however, for numerical features like square footage, it disregards the variability and distribution within the data, potentially leading to misleading analysis and model performance.
Explanation
Evaluate the effectiveness of various imputation methods for missing data in relation to model accuracy and missing data percentage.
Correct Choice: Employ k-nearest neighbors (KNN) imputation to fill missing square footage.
KNN imputation maintains the sample's structure and can accurately predict missing values based on similarity to nearest neighbors. It's well-suited for datasets with complex relationships.
Incorrect Choice: Impute missing square footage using mean imputation before training.
Mean imputation can reduce variance and introduce bias, especially if data is not missing at random. It's simple but may not be accurate for skewed distributions.
Incorrect Choice: Apply linear regression to estimate missing square footage based on other features.
While linear regression can predict missing values, it assumes a linear relationship between features, which may not always hold, potentially leading to inaccurate imputations.
Incorrect Choice: Replace missing square footage with the dataset's mode.
Mode imputation is simplistic and might be used for categorical data; however, for numerical features like square footage, it disregards the variability and distribution within the data, potentially leading to misleading analysis and model performance.
Question 12 Multiple Choice
A data scientist is training a deep learning model for image classification using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The model performs exceptionally well on the training data but significantly underperforms on new, unseen images. To minimize overfitting and improve the model's generalization to new data, which TWO of the following approaches should the data scientist take? (Select TWO)
Explanation
Click "Show Answer" to see the explanation here
Focus on techniques that reduce model complexity and increase dataset variability to prevent overfitting.
Correct choice: Use early stopping
Early stopping halts training when performance on a validation set stops improving, preventing overfitting by not allowing the model to learn noise in the training data.
Correct choice: Use dropout regularization
Dropout randomly deactivates a subset of neurons during training, which helps in preventing the network from becoming too dependent on any single neuron and thus reduces overfitting.
Incorrect choice: Employ gradient checking
Gradient checking is used to verify the correctness of backpropagation implementation by comparing the gradients to numerical approximations, not directly addressing overfitting.
Incorrect choice: Use more layers in the network
Adding more layers can increase model complexity, potentially leading to overfitting, especially if there's not enough data to support the complexity.
Incorrect choice: Use more features in the training data
Adding too many features without proper selection or regularization can also lead to overfitting, as the model may pick up noise instead of the underlying pattern.
Explanation
Focus on techniques that reduce model complexity and increase dataset variability to prevent overfitting.
Correct choice: Use early stopping
Early stopping halts training when performance on a validation set stops improving, preventing overfitting by not allowing the model to learn noise in the training data.
Correct choice: Use dropout regularization
Dropout randomly deactivates a subset of neurons during training, which helps in preventing the network from becoming too dependent on any single neuron and thus reduces overfitting.
Incorrect choice: Employ gradient checking
Gradient checking is used to verify the correctness of backpropagation implementation by comparing the gradients to numerical approximations, not directly addressing overfitting.
Incorrect choice: Use more layers in the network
Adding more layers can increase model complexity, potentially leading to overfitting, especially if there's not enough data to support the complexity.
Incorrect choice: Use more features in the training data
Adding too many features without proper selection or regularization can also lead to overfitting, as the model may pick up noise instead of the underlying pattern.
Question 13 Single Choice
As a data scientist involved in the development of a self-driving car system, your task is to implement a computer vision solution capable of categorizing every pixel in images captured by the car's cameras. The categories include identifying objects like people, buildings, roads, signs, and vehicles.
How would you implement a computer vision solution capable of classifying every pixel in images captured by the car's cameras?
Explanation
Click "Show Answer" to see the explanation here
Evaluate each choice based on the requirements for pixel-level semantic segmentation of the car's camera images, considering the capabilities of the AWS services mentioned.
Correct choice: Fine-tune the SageMaker built-in semantic segmentation algorithm using a pre-trained ResNet50 backbone
The SageMaker semantic segmentation algorithm is designed for pixel-level classification, which directly addresses the requirement. Using a pre-trained ResNet50 backbone can leverage transfer learning to improve performance. The SageMaker semantic segmentation algorithm provides a choice of three built-in algorithms - Fully-Convolutional Network (FCN), Pyramid Scene Parsing (PSP), and DeepLabV3 - each with a choice of ResNet50 or ResNet101 backbones. These algorithms and backbones can be used to train custom pixel-level classification models.
Incorrect choice: Fine-tune the SageMaker built-in object detection algorithm using a pre-trained Faster R-CNN backbone
Object detection models provide bounding boxes around objects, but do not provide the required pixel-level classification. Semantic segmentation is a more appropriate approach.
Incorrect choice: Customize Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels to build a pixel-level image classification model for analyzing the car's camera images
Rekognition is primarily for object detection and classification, not semantic segmentation. It may not be the best fit for the pixel-level classification requirement.
Incorrect choice: Customize Amazon Rekognition to process the car's camera video streams
Rekognition is not optimized for the pixel-level classification task. Video processing may not be necessary if the requirement is to classify individual camera images.
Explanation
Evaluate each choice based on the requirements for pixel-level semantic segmentation of the car's camera images, considering the capabilities of the AWS services mentioned.
Correct choice: Fine-tune the SageMaker built-in semantic segmentation algorithm using a pre-trained ResNet50 backbone
The SageMaker semantic segmentation algorithm is designed for pixel-level classification, which directly addresses the requirement. Using a pre-trained ResNet50 backbone can leverage transfer learning to improve performance. The SageMaker semantic segmentation algorithm provides a choice of three built-in algorithms - Fully-Convolutional Network (FCN), Pyramid Scene Parsing (PSP), and DeepLabV3 - each with a choice of ResNet50 or ResNet101 backbones. These algorithms and backbones can be used to train custom pixel-level classification models.
Incorrect choice: Fine-tune the SageMaker built-in object detection algorithm using a pre-trained Faster R-CNN backbone
Object detection models provide bounding boxes around objects, but do not provide the required pixel-level classification. Semantic segmentation is a more appropriate approach.
Incorrect choice: Customize Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels to build a pixel-level image classification model for analyzing the car's camera images
Rekognition is primarily for object detection and classification, not semantic segmentation. It may not be the best fit for the pixel-level classification requirement.
Incorrect choice: Customize Amazon Rekognition to process the car's camera video streams
Rekognition is not optimized for the pixel-level classification task. Video processing may not be necessary if the requirement is to classify individual camera images.
Question 14 Single Choice
A financial services firm is leveraging Amazon SageMaker to develop machine learning models that predict market trends. Due to the sensitive nature of their data, the firm's policy prohibits direct internet access from their virtual private cloud (VPC) to ensure the security of their data. They require the ability to use SageMaker notebook instances for model development without exposing these instances to the internet. What approach should the firm take to securely utilize SageMaker notebooks within their VPC in compliance with their security policy?
Explanation
Click "Show Answer" to see the explanation here
Mastering "Infrastructure Security" as detailed in the SageMaker developer guide is essential. Thoroughly reviewing its extensive content is crucial to excelling in this certification.
Correct Choice: Disable internet access for SageMaker, establish VPC endpoints, update security groups, and access SageMaker notebooks through PrivateLink.
This configuration secures SageMaker notebooks by disabling direct internet access and employing VPC endpoints, ensuring all traffic between your laptop and the SageMaker notebook stays within the AWS network. AWS PrivateLink facilitates private connectivity to SageMaker, bypassing the public internet and enhancing security.
Incorrect Choice: Disable internet access for SageMaker, configure VPC peering, update security groups, and access SageMaker notebooks through peered VPC.
VPC peering is designed for network connectivity between two VPCs, not for providing direct access to SageMaker notebooks from on-premises or external environments.
Incorrect Choice: Disable internet access for SageMaker, establish VPC endpoints, update security groups, and access SageMaker notebooks through AWS Client VPN.
AWS Client VPN enables a secure connection from a client device, such as a laptop or mobile device, to the AWS network, providing secure access to AWS resources and on-premises networks over the public internet.
Incorrect Choice: Disable internet access for SageMaker, create NAT Gateway, update route tables, and link to SageMaker notebooks.
Establishing a NAT Gateway enables outbound internet connectivity for resources within private subnets, without restricting public internet access. Contrary to the objective of securing SageMaker notebooks by mitigating public internet exposure, a NAT Gateway permits instances in private subnets to initiate connections to external services, while preventing any inbound attempts, thus maintaining a balance between connectivity and security.
Explanation
Mastering "Infrastructure Security" as detailed in the SageMaker developer guide is essential. Thoroughly reviewing its extensive content is crucial to excelling in this certification.
Correct Choice: Disable internet access for SageMaker, establish VPC endpoints, update security groups, and access SageMaker notebooks through PrivateLink.
This configuration secures SageMaker notebooks by disabling direct internet access and employing VPC endpoints, ensuring all traffic between your laptop and the SageMaker notebook stays within the AWS network. AWS PrivateLink facilitates private connectivity to SageMaker, bypassing the public internet and enhancing security.
Incorrect Choice: Disable internet access for SageMaker, configure VPC peering, update security groups, and access SageMaker notebooks through peered VPC.
VPC peering is designed for network connectivity between two VPCs, not for providing direct access to SageMaker notebooks from on-premises or external environments.
Incorrect Choice: Disable internet access for SageMaker, establish VPC endpoints, update security groups, and access SageMaker notebooks through AWS Client VPN.
AWS Client VPN enables a secure connection from a client device, such as a laptop or mobile device, to the AWS network, providing secure access to AWS resources and on-premises networks over the public internet.
Incorrect Choice: Disable internet access for SageMaker, create NAT Gateway, update route tables, and link to SageMaker notebooks.
Establishing a NAT Gateway enables outbound internet connectivity for resources within private subnets, without restricting public internet access. Contrary to the objective of securing SageMaker notebooks by mitigating public internet exposure, a NAT Gateway permits instances in private subnets to initiate connections to external services, while preventing any inbound attempts, thus maintaining a balance between connectivity and security.
Question 15 Single Choice
A data scientist at a retail company is analyzing customer purchase patterns to segment them into distinct groups for targeted marketing campaigns. To achieve this, the scientist is employing k-Means clustering. What is the most effective method for selecting the optimal number of clusters (k) to accurately categorize customers into meaningful segments?
Explanation
Click "Show Answer" to see the explanation here
Focus on services best suited for machine learning and cluster analysis, and consider how they'd specifically support choosing k.
Correct Choice: Apply the "elbow method" by analyzing a plot of the total within-cluster sum of squares (WSS) against the number of clusters (k).
The Elbow Method is a popular technique for determining k in k-Means clustering. Amazon SageMaker supports various machine learning algorithms, including k-Means, making it suitable for implementing this method. Steps include training multiple models with different k values, preferrably in parallel, and choosing the k at the "elbow" point where the decrease in the cost function diminishes. Utilizing k-means through Amazon SageMaker offers extra advantages such as scalable training and automatic model deployment, eliminating the need for infrastructure setup and management.
Incorrect Choice: Implement the silhouette analysis using AWS Glue DataBrew for data preparation and feature engineering before clustering.
AWS Glue DataBrew is great for data preparation but doesn't directly assist in selecting the number of clusters. It's useful for cleaning and preparing your data before analysis.
Incorrect Choice: Apply Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using Amazon Redshift ML to automatically select the best k value based on data dimensionality reduction.
While PCA is useful for dimensionality reduction and can improve clustering performance, it doesn't directly help in choosing the optimal number of clusters. Amazon Redshift ML facilitates machine learning predictions in SQL but isn't tailored for determining k in clustering.
Incorrect Choice: Utilize AWS Lambda with Amazon QuickSight for dynamic scaling and computing the Gap Statistic to find the optimal number of clusters.
AWS Lambda and Amazon QuickSight are powerful for serverless computing and business intelligence, respectively. However, they're not the best tools for the specific task of calculating the optimal number of clusters. The Gap Statistic method is valid but typically requires a more direct computational approach, like scripting in Python or R within a machine learning framework. While the Gap Statistics method provides a more principled statistical approach to determining the number of clusters by comparing observed clustering to a null reference model of no clusters, its greater computational demands can make it less cost-effective, especially when cloud resources and budget constraints are considerations.
Explanation
Focus on services best suited for machine learning and cluster analysis, and consider how they'd specifically support choosing k.
Correct Choice: Apply the "elbow method" by analyzing a plot of the total within-cluster sum of squares (WSS) against the number of clusters (k).
The Elbow Method is a popular technique for determining k in k-Means clustering. Amazon SageMaker supports various machine learning algorithms, including k-Means, making it suitable for implementing this method. Steps include training multiple models with different k values, preferrably in parallel, and choosing the k at the "elbow" point where the decrease in the cost function diminishes. Utilizing k-means through Amazon SageMaker offers extra advantages such as scalable training and automatic model deployment, eliminating the need for infrastructure setup and management.
Incorrect Choice: Implement the silhouette analysis using AWS Glue DataBrew for data preparation and feature engineering before clustering.
AWS Glue DataBrew is great for data preparation but doesn't directly assist in selecting the number of clusters. It's useful for cleaning and preparing your data before analysis.
Incorrect Choice: Apply Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using Amazon Redshift ML to automatically select the best k value based on data dimensionality reduction.
While PCA is useful for dimensionality reduction and can improve clustering performance, it doesn't directly help in choosing the optimal number of clusters. Amazon Redshift ML facilitates machine learning predictions in SQL but isn't tailored for determining k in clustering.
Incorrect Choice: Utilize AWS Lambda with Amazon QuickSight for dynamic scaling and computing the Gap Statistic to find the optimal number of clusters.
AWS Lambda and Amazon QuickSight are powerful for serverless computing and business intelligence, respectively. However, they're not the best tools for the specific task of calculating the optimal number of clusters. The Gap Statistic method is valid but typically requires a more direct computational approach, like scripting in Python or R within a machine learning framework. While the Gap Statistics method provides a more principled statistical approach to determining the number of clusters by comparing observed clustering to a null reference model of no clusters, its greater computational demands can make it less cost-effective, especially when cloud resources and budget constraints are considerations.
Question 16 Multiple Choice
As part of a major content digitization initiative, your team has been tasked with organizing a vast library of encyclopedia articles to enable efficient search and retrieval. The articles are currently stored in raw text format, without any pre-assigned topic labels or categories. To unlock the full value of this content, you need a way to automatically classify the articles into relevant topics with minimal manual effort. Which AWS services or tools would you recommend using to tackle this challenge? (SELECT TWO)
Explanation
Click "Show Answer" to see the explanation here
To approach this question, the learner should review their knowledge of common NLP techniques like topic modeling, text classification, and supervised/unsupervised learning. They should evaluate the provided choices based on the specific capabilities of each AWS service and how well they align with the requirements of automatically assigning topics to a large corpus of unstructured text data.
Correct Choice: Use Amazon Comprehend's Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) feature to automatically classify the encyclopedia articles.
Amazon Comprehend's LDA feature is specifically designed for unsupervised topic modeling of unstructured text data. It can automatically discover and assign topics to the encyclopedia articles with minimal human effort.
Correct Choice: Use the Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) to automatically discover and assign topics to the encyclopedia articles.
The Amazon SageMaker NTM is a powerful unsupervised topic modeling algorithm that can automatically discover and assign topics to the encyclopedia articles. It can capture more complex topic relationships compared to traditional LDA.
Incorrect Choice: Employ Amazon Kendra for natural language search, allowing users to find articles by querying with natural language without pre-classifying them into topics.
While Amazon Kendra provides natural language search capabilities, it is not designed for automatically classifying the encyclopedia articles into topics. Kendra is more suitable for interactive search and retrieval, not unsupervised topic modeling.
Incorrect Choice: Use Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to manually label a sample of the articles, then train a custom text classification model on the labeled data.
While this approach can work, it requires significant manual effort to label a sample of the articles. It may not be the most efficient solution for automatically classifying the entire encyclopedia dataset.
Incorrect Choice: Leverage Amazon Textract's document understanding capabilities to extract topics from the article text.
While Amazon Textract is a powerful service for extracting structured data from documents, it may not be the most suitable choice for automatically assigning topics to the unstructured encyclopedia articles. Textract is primarily designed for tasks like extracting text, tables, and forms from scanned documents, rather than performing advanced natural language processing required for unsupervised topic modeling. Other AWS services that are more focused on natural language understanding and unsupervised topic discovery would likely be a better fit for this specific use case.
Explanation
To approach this question, the learner should review their knowledge of common NLP techniques like topic modeling, text classification, and supervised/unsupervised learning. They should evaluate the provided choices based on the specific capabilities of each AWS service and how well they align with the requirements of automatically assigning topics to a large corpus of unstructured text data.
Correct Choice: Use Amazon Comprehend's Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) feature to automatically classify the encyclopedia articles.
Amazon Comprehend's LDA feature is specifically designed for unsupervised topic modeling of unstructured text data. It can automatically discover and assign topics to the encyclopedia articles with minimal human effort.
Correct Choice: Use the Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) to automatically discover and assign topics to the encyclopedia articles.
The Amazon SageMaker NTM is a powerful unsupervised topic modeling algorithm that can automatically discover and assign topics to the encyclopedia articles. It can capture more complex topic relationships compared to traditional LDA.
Incorrect Choice: Employ Amazon Kendra for natural language search, allowing users to find articles by querying with natural language without pre-classifying them into topics.
While Amazon Kendra provides natural language search capabilities, it is not designed for automatically classifying the encyclopedia articles into topics. Kendra is more suitable for interactive search and retrieval, not unsupervised topic modeling.
Incorrect Choice: Use Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to manually label a sample of the articles, then train a custom text classification model on the labeled data.
While this approach can work, it requires significant manual effort to label a sample of the articles. It may not be the most efficient solution for automatically classifying the entire encyclopedia dataset.
Incorrect Choice: Leverage Amazon Textract's document understanding capabilities to extract topics from the article text.
While Amazon Textract is a powerful service for extracting structured data from documents, it may not be the most suitable choice for automatically assigning topics to the unstructured encyclopedia articles. Textract is primarily designed for tasks like extracting text, tables, and forms from scanned documents, rather than performing advanced natural language processing required for unsupervised topic modeling. Other AWS services that are more focused on natural language understanding and unsupervised topic discovery would likely be a better fit for this specific use case.
Question 17 Single Choice
A healthcare analytics firm is leveraging Amazon SageMaker to train machine learning models on sensitive patient data. To comply with strict data privacy regulations, the training jobs are configured to run within a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) that lacks direct internet access. What method should be employed to ensure these training jobs can securely access training data stored in an Amazon S3 bucket?
Explanation
Click "Show Answer" to see the explanation here
Identify solutions that enable secure, private access to AWS services without requiring internet connectivity.
Correct Choice: Utilize VPC endpoints to allow direct, private connections to Amazon S3 from the VPC.
VPC endpoints facilitate secure and private communications between AWS services without traversing the public internet, making it the most suitable option for accessing S3 from a VPC without internet access. This aligns with AWS best practices for accessing S3 from private VPCs securely.
Incorrect Choice: Configure an Internet Gateway in the VPC for SageMaker to access S3 buckets over the internet.
Adding an Internet Gateway would provide internet access, violating the original premise of maintaining a VPC without internet connectivity for security reasons.
Incorrect Choice: Establish a NAT Gateway in each subnet where SageMaker training jobs are run to enable S3 access.
NAT Gateways are used to enable instances in a private subnet to initiate outbound traffic to the internet (or other AWS services), but they do not support inbound traffic and thus are not suitable for this scenario. They also indirectly imply accessing the internet, which contradicts the no-internet connectivity requirement.
Incorrect Choice: Use Direct Connect to establish a dedicated network connection from the VPC to S3 for secure data access.
AWS Direct Connect is used to establish a private connection between an on-premises network and AWS, not within AWS services. Moreover, it's more complex and not required for the scenario of accessing S3 from SageMaker within a VPC.
Explanation
Identify solutions that enable secure, private access to AWS services without requiring internet connectivity.
Correct Choice: Utilize VPC endpoints to allow direct, private connections to Amazon S3 from the VPC.
VPC endpoints facilitate secure and private communications between AWS services without traversing the public internet, making it the most suitable option for accessing S3 from a VPC without internet access. This aligns with AWS best practices for accessing S3 from private VPCs securely.
Incorrect Choice: Configure an Internet Gateway in the VPC for SageMaker to access S3 buckets over the internet.
Adding an Internet Gateway would provide internet access, violating the original premise of maintaining a VPC without internet connectivity for security reasons.
Incorrect Choice: Establish a NAT Gateway in each subnet where SageMaker training jobs are run to enable S3 access.
NAT Gateways are used to enable instances in a private subnet to initiate outbound traffic to the internet (or other AWS services), but they do not support inbound traffic and thus are not suitable for this scenario. They also indirectly imply accessing the internet, which contradicts the no-internet connectivity requirement.
Incorrect Choice: Use Direct Connect to establish a dedicated network connection from the VPC to S3 for secure data access.
AWS Direct Connect is used to establish a private connection between an on-premises network and AWS, not within AWS services. Moreover, it's more complex and not required for the scenario of accessing S3 from SageMaker within a VPC.
Question 18 Single Choice
In a clinical trial dataset that encompasses a variety of features including Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), it's observed that the features exhibit low correlation with one another. The dataset is almost complete, with less than 1% of the MAP values missing. Aside from a few outliers, the MAP data is relatively uniformly distributed, and all other features are fully accounted for. Given these characteristics, which approach should be adopted to manage the missing MAP data most effectively?
Explanation
Click "Show Answer" to see the explanation here
To determine the most appropriate method for handling missing data, consider the distribution of the dataset and the influence of outliers on central tendency measures. Review machine learning topics related to data preprocessing, specifically imputation techniques and their impact on model accuracy and bias.
Correct Choice: Impute the missing MAP values using the median of the MAP data available, considering the distribution's characteristics and the presence of outliers.
Given the dataset's description, where the MAP data is mostly evenly distributed but includes some outliers, imputing missing values with the median is the most robust approach. The median is less sensitive to outliers than the mean, making it a better choice for datasets where outliers are present. Since the proportion of missing data is minimal (<1%), this approach allows for maintaining the integrity of the MAP feature without introducing significant bias.
Incorrect Choice: Impute the missing MAP values with the mean of the available MAP data, aiming for a central tendency measure.
While imputing missing values with the mean is a common practice, this method is more susceptible to distortion by outliers, especially in datasets where these are present. Given the mention of outliers in the MAP distribution, relying on the mean for imputation could skew the results, potentially leading to inaccurate representations of the MAP values.
Incorrect Choice: Exclude the MAP column entirely from the dataset due to the incompleteness of its data.
Dropping the MAP column entirely would eliminate a potentially valuable feature from the analysis, which is not advisable given that the majority of the MAP data is intact. This approach would disregard useful information that could contribute significantly to the outcomes of the clinical trial analysis.
Incorrect Choice: Fill in the missing MAP values with random noise to maintain the dataset's volume.
Introducing random noise to replace missing MAP values does not adhere to sound statistical principles and would likely degrade the quality of the dataset. This method does not contribute to an accurate or meaningful imputation of the missing data and could introduce additional variability into the analysis.
Explanation
To determine the most appropriate method for handling missing data, consider the distribution of the dataset and the influence of outliers on central tendency measures. Review machine learning topics related to data preprocessing, specifically imputation techniques and their impact on model accuracy and bias.
Correct Choice: Impute the missing MAP values using the median of the MAP data available, considering the distribution's characteristics and the presence of outliers.
Given the dataset's description, where the MAP data is mostly evenly distributed but includes some outliers, imputing missing values with the median is the most robust approach. The median is less sensitive to outliers than the mean, making it a better choice for datasets where outliers are present. Since the proportion of missing data is minimal (<1%), this approach allows for maintaining the integrity of the MAP feature without introducing significant bias.
Incorrect Choice: Impute the missing MAP values with the mean of the available MAP data, aiming for a central tendency measure.
While imputing missing values with the mean is a common practice, this method is more susceptible to distortion by outliers, especially in datasets where these are present. Given the mention of outliers in the MAP distribution, relying on the mean for imputation could skew the results, potentially leading to inaccurate representations of the MAP values.
Incorrect Choice: Exclude the MAP column entirely from the dataset due to the incompleteness of its data.
Dropping the MAP column entirely would eliminate a potentially valuable feature from the analysis, which is not advisable given that the majority of the MAP data is intact. This approach would disregard useful information that could contribute significantly to the outcomes of the clinical trial analysis.
Incorrect Choice: Fill in the missing MAP values with random noise to maintain the dataset's volume.
Introducing random noise to replace missing MAP values does not adhere to sound statistical principles and would likely degrade the quality of the dataset. This method does not contribute to an accurate or meaningful imputation of the missing data and could introduce additional variability into the analysis.
Question 19 Single Choice
A team is developing a "Universal Translator" application that can recognize spoken language, translate it into English, and then articulate the English translation audibly. Which sequence of AWS services should be implemented to achieve this functionality?
Explanation
Click "Show Answer" to see the explanation here
Identify the services that specifically handle speech recognition, language translation, and speech synthesis in the correct order of operations.
Correct choice: Amazon Transcribe → Amazon Translate → Amazon Polly
This sequence accurately reflects the required steps: speech-to-text conversion, text translation, and text-to-speech synthesis, matching the workflow of a universal translator.
Correct choice: Amazon Transcribe to recognize and transcribe speech, Amazon Translate for translation to English, and Amazon Polly to synthesize the translated text into speech.
This choice details the process using service descriptions, clearly outlining the appropriate use of each service in the workflow.
Incorrect choice: Amazon Polly → Amazon Transcribe → Amazon Translate
This sequence begins with speech synthesis, which is not the starting point for a translation tool that first requires speech recognition.
Incorrect choice: Amazon Rekognition → Amazon Translate → Amazon Polly
Amazon Rekognition is designed for image and video analysis, not speech recognition, making it unsuitable for the initial step in a translation application.
Incorrect choice: AWS Lambda → Amazon Translate → Amazon Polly
Starting with AWS Lambda suggests custom code execution without specifying speech-to-text recognition, missing a critical initial step of converting spoken language into text.
Explanation
Identify the services that specifically handle speech recognition, language translation, and speech synthesis in the correct order of operations.
Correct choice: Amazon Transcribe → Amazon Translate → Amazon Polly
This sequence accurately reflects the required steps: speech-to-text conversion, text translation, and text-to-speech synthesis, matching the workflow of a universal translator.
Correct choice: Amazon Transcribe to recognize and transcribe speech, Amazon Translate for translation to English, and Amazon Polly to synthesize the translated text into speech.
This choice details the process using service descriptions, clearly outlining the appropriate use of each service in the workflow.
Incorrect choice: Amazon Polly → Amazon Transcribe → Amazon Translate
This sequence begins with speech synthesis, which is not the starting point for a translation tool that first requires speech recognition.
Incorrect choice: Amazon Rekognition → Amazon Translate → Amazon Polly
Amazon Rekognition is designed for image and video analysis, not speech recognition, making it unsuitable for the initial step in a translation application.
Incorrect choice: AWS Lambda → Amazon Translate → Amazon Polly
Starting with AWS Lambda suggests custom code execution without specifying speech-to-text recognition, missing a critical initial step of converting spoken language into text.
Question 20 Single Choice
An AI developer is fine-tuning a deep learning model for image recognition tasks. During the training process, the model's performance is measured by its accuracy on a separate validation dataset after each training epoch. The model demonstrates consistent improvement in accuracy up to the 100th epoch. However, post-100th epoch, while the training accuracy still improves, the validation accuracy starts to decline. What is the most probable remediation for this divergence in accuracy trends between the training and validation sets?
Explanation
Click "Show Answer" to see the explanation here
Focus on strategies that prevent overfitting and allow a model to generalize well to new data.
Correct Choice: Implement early stopping using Amazon SageMaker's automatic model tuning to halt training when validation accuracy decreases.
Early stopping halts training when the validation accuracy starts to drop, suggesting overfitting. In SageMaker, you can set up early stopping in automatic model tuning jobs by defining a stopping condition based on validation accuracy metrics.
Incorrect Choice: Increase Amazon SageMaker's resource allocation to the model training job to process a larger validation set.
More resources may speed up training but won't prevent overfitting. This would be valid if computational constraints were causing training to be incomplete or slow.
Incorrect Choice: Adjust the learning rate in Amazon SageMaker's hyperparameter optimization to improve validation set performance.
Adjusting the learning rate might help convergence but won't address overfitting once it starts. This is valid earlier in training to find the optimal learning rate.
Incorrect Choice: Utilize Amazon S3's versioning feature to revert to the model state at the 100th epoch for subsequent training sessions.
Versioning allows reverting to a previous model state but doesn't prevent overfitting during training. It's valid for model version control and rollback, not as a proactive training strategy.
Explanation
Focus on strategies that prevent overfitting and allow a model to generalize well to new data.
Correct Choice: Implement early stopping using Amazon SageMaker's automatic model tuning to halt training when validation accuracy decreases.
Early stopping halts training when the validation accuracy starts to drop, suggesting overfitting. In SageMaker, you can set up early stopping in automatic model tuning jobs by defining a stopping condition based on validation accuracy metrics.
Incorrect Choice: Increase Amazon SageMaker's resource allocation to the model training job to process a larger validation set.
More resources may speed up training but won't prevent overfitting. This would be valid if computational constraints were causing training to be incomplete or slow.
Incorrect Choice: Adjust the learning rate in Amazon SageMaker's hyperparameter optimization to improve validation set performance.
Adjusting the learning rate might help convergence but won't address overfitting once it starts. This is valid earlier in training to find the optimal learning rate.
Incorrect Choice: Utilize Amazon S3's versioning feature to revert to the model state at the 100th epoch for subsequent training sessions.
Versioning allows reverting to a previous model state but doesn't prevent overfitting during training. It's valid for model version control and rollback, not as a proactive training strategy.
